In a quick U-turn of events, OnlyFans announced today that it has suspended its plan to ban explicit content on the platform.
Many cartoon porn consumers like animated porn because it doesn’t involve real people. But does that make it healthy to watch?
Because of reputable research, we can look past preconceived notions about if porn is “good” or “bad.” There are solid facts that can tell us a more clear answer, and as they stand, it isn’t good news for our porn-obsessed society.
Some self-generated images represent a child who was groomed or coerced, while many teens today “share nudes” supposedly willingly.
Did you know 1 in 3 underage teens report having seen nonconsensually shared nudes of other minors—which legally qualifies as “child porn”?
The ethics committee released a report recommending that the Canadian federal government strengthen laws to curb the spread of child sexual exploitation material and rape videos online.
Even if you aren’t paying to watch porn, porn companies are making money off of your visit to their site. But what about paying for porn through sites like OnlyFans? Is that a more ethical or healthy choice? Let’s discuss.
If performer consent is the only means by which they measure the harmfulness of their content, it’s an incredibly low bar to set. Here’s why.
For the last four decades, 22 has been the average age of female performers. Men have dropped almost 5 years—from 29 to 24—since the 70’s.
Popular porn sites have content featuring the sexual exploitation of one of the more vulnerable groups of people in the world—displaced refugees.
Recently, a comment on r/AskReddit went viral under the thread “What are some dark secrets about the porn industry?” With over 17,900 upvotes, this one porn site builder’s response got people talking.
